Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 22 Suppl 2: S401, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2311841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sézary syndrome (SS) is an aggressive type of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). Due to its low prevalence, there are limited data on real-world treatment patterns of available SS therapies. Furthermore, recent approvals of new agents for patients with CTCL as well as COVID-19 likely impacted real-world treatment patterns. OBJECTIVE: To examine real-world treatment patterns and the impact of COVID-19 among SS patients treated in 2018-2020 in the United States. METHODS: Patients in the 2018-2020 Symphony Health Solutions database were classified into 3 groups: ≥1 diagnosis of SS (ICD-10-CM code: C84.1x) in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns for National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline 2.2021 recommended therapies were examined: systemic therapy (e.g., extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), parenteral, oral agents), skin-directed therapy (SDT, e.g., topical, local radiation, total skin electron beam therapy, phototherapy) and bone marrow transplant. The impact of COVID-19 was assessed using quarterly analysis. RESULTS: The analyses included 869, 882, and 853 SS patients in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively (mean age: 66.3, 66.9 and 67.3 years; male: 54.4%, 54.8%, and 55.6%). Overall, systemic therapy increased from 2018-2020 (41.8% to 46.5%), with increased parenteral (20.7% to 28.7%) but decreased ECP (17.0% to 13.5%) usage. SDT increased from 2018-2020 (48.9% to 52.9%), with increased topical (42.3% to 48.3%) but decreased phototherapy (6.3% to 4.1%) usage. ECP, mogamulizumab, and bexarotene were the most prescribed systemic therapies in 2019-2020, with mogamulizumab being the only one with increased usage over time. Quarterly analysis showed decreasing ECP from Q1 to Q4 within each year, with a notable drop in Q2 2020. For parental systemics, there was an increasing trend in 2019 and 2020, but lower utilization in Q4 2020 than in Q3 2020. For oral systemic, there was a notable drop in Q2 2020 but an increased trend in Q3-Q4 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This claims analysis indicated increased use in systemic and SDT among SS patients in 2018-2020. The quarterly analysis indicated that the drop in ECP and oral systemic usage in Q2 2020 coincided with the onset of the pandemic, but there was a stable use of parenteral systemic during 2020.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous , Mycosis Fungoides , Photopheresis , Sezary Syndrome , Skin Neoplasms , Bexarotene , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/epidemiology , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/pathology , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/therapy , Male , Mycosis Fungoides/therapy , Sezary Syndrome/epidemiology , Sezary Syndrome/pathology , Sezary Syndrome/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , United States/epidemiology
2.
Photochem Photobiol Sci ; 20(9): 1239-1242, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1375868

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, social isolation measures were imposed in Brazil to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), requiring health services to implement contingency plans. The main objective of the study was to verify the status of the disease, self-reported by patients who discontinued phototherapy, during a period of social isolation. METHODS: All patients receiving phototherapy at the Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Brazil, prior to the implementation of social distancing measures were eligible for inclusion in the study. 86 patients answered a questionnaire during a medical evaluation. RESULTS: 95% of patients who stopped phototherapy reported a worsening of disease status. Only 19% of patients continued to attend phototherapy sessions during the social isolation period. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic led most patients to stop phototherapy, resulting in the perception of increased disease severity in an outpatient sample in southern Brazil.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Phototherapy , Treatment Refusal , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/epidemiology , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/therapy , Male , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Psoriasis/therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Social Isolation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vitiligo/epidemiology , Vitiligo/therapy
3.
Clin Dermatol ; 39(1): 64-75, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1300692

ABSTRACT

Primary cutaneous lymphomas are defined as a heterogenic group of T- and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas that present initially in the skin. Patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas are at a higher risk for developing complications in case of infection with the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected the established diagnostic approach, staging, and therapeutic guidelines in patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas. In the light of the current global health crisis, management of primary cutaneous lymphomas needs to be adjusted. The key to achieving this is to balance the optimal control of the lymphoma, with a minimal increase of the personal risk for COVID-19 exposure and complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Lymphoma, B-Cell/therapy , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/therapy , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Lymphoma, B-Cell/classification , Lymphoma, B-Cell/diagnosis , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/classification , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Skin Neoplasms/classification , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis
4.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(1): e14463, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-894743

ABSTRACT

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spreads quickly all over the world. There are no sufficient data in the literature about COVID-19 infection and cutaneous lymphomas. This review sheds the light on what is known so far about COVID-19 with a cutaneous lymphoma perspective. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) diagnosis does not represent a predisposing factor to viral infections and most of CTCL patients have indolent disease. However, physicians should be cautious with patients with aggressive primary cutaneous lymphomas and advanced CTCL. Different treatment strategies for cutaneous lymphomas should be taken into consideration during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, it is highly needed to estimate the benefit-to-risk ratio on a case-by-case basis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/epidemiology , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy
5.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(2): 703-704, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-92098
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL